Das der >>Leopard 1 80 cm also mm Panzerstahl penetrieren kann. Knife Junky Tipps u.s.w oder halt wie man einigermaßen WoT gescheit zocken kann. Update (Januar ). Doppelläufige sowjetische Fahrzeuge: Drei kolossale doppelläufige sowjetische Panzer sind bereit, das Schlachtfeld zu stürmen. Der Leopard 1 wurde gebufft! Endlich, WG, was hat da so lange gedauert? Gemeinsam mit Mouz starten wir in die WOT-Wildnis um Raubkatze & Co .
Update-ÜbersichtDer Leopard 1 wurde gebufft! Endlich, WG, was hat da so lange gedauert? Gemeinsam mit Mouz starten wir in die WOT-Wildnis um Raubkatze & Co . Das der >>Leopard 1 80 cm also mm Panzerstahl penetrieren kann. Knife Junky Tipps u.s.w oder halt wie man einigermaßen WoT gescheit zocken kann. Update (Januar ). Doppelläufige sowjetische Fahrzeuge: Drei kolossale doppelläufige sowjetische Panzer sind bereit, das Schlachtfeld zu stürmen.
Wot Leopard 1 Buff Continue Reading VideoLeo1 Buffed up! Fired up! Update (Januar ). Doppelläufige sowjetische Fahrzeuge: Drei kolossale doppelläufige sowjetische Panzer sind bereit, das Schlachtfeld zu stürmen. Der Leopard 1 wurde gebufft! Endlich, WG, was hat da so lange gedauert? Gemeinsam mit Mouz starten wir in die WOT-Wildnis um Raubkatze & Co . Wargamings Panzer-MMO World of Tanks kam vor 10 Jahren heraus und ist der Leopard 1, aber erst nachdem er einen Buff bekommen hat. Das der >>Leopard 1 80 cm also mm Panzerstahl penetrieren kann. Knife Junky Tipps u.s.w oder halt wie man einigermaßen WoT gescheit zocken kann.
Instead fix the gunhandling: aiming time down to 0. I'm kind of surprised that considering it was one of their ' promises' that they haven't got information out about the proposed buffs to the Leo 1, E, Kranvagn, IS4 and STB You'd think, if they were going for their rather standard and generic buffs it was an easy one to tick off and get done early.
The Centurion AX also has a decent turret. What the Leopard 1 needs are buffs to aim time, accuracy, turret dispersion, shell velocity and reverse speed.
Then it remains a paper sniper, but with those buffs it can perform it's main role better. I would much rather see a more unique Leopard with weak turret but super good gun dispersion and accuracy values, good mobility and decent camo.
Remember, the Tank isn't Designed around Armor in the first place It's built around the Gun and Mobility Mobility Adjustments to the same Hidden Numbers would also Improve things, or something to aid Camo under Movement similar to a Light, but somewhere Inbetween maybe The changes to STB-1 are welcome, but still begs the question: Why would one grind the entire JPN MT line to get the hydro-suspension feature at tier 10, when they could just go play the new Swedish MTs which gets the feature starting at tier 8 and has bigger guns, better armor, and last but not least, better gun depression?
But split the half 6 degrees into the hull depression is less impressive. Since at normal speed it will have only -6 gun depression. I agree, at least 8 or 9 normal and then tilt the extra degrees.
This needs to be looked over. I have the Leopard 1 and i like that its role is enhanced. However the maps very often are made for brawlers and it will be hit or miss whether or not the changes will be meaningful.
Making a sniper tank better at shooting one the move and less durable is crazy. Buff its pen and alpha make it crazy accurate and buff its camo rating done leopard 1 better.
They had the right idea with up its alpha the less it had to expose itself to do the same damage was nice.
But overall im happy with the leo changes but PTA changes that tank is perfect please leave it alone. Please buff the pen and dispersion back on the amx 30 b please.
Idk about the stb 1 would like to test it. The lack of pen on the STB-1 and gun handling is still going to make that tank worthless, due to the fact that heavy tanks have thicker armor in the front and since WG, likes those corridor it would be hard to have a close fighter tank, then WG is going to nerf the movement on this tank, might as sell those STB-1 and go for the Swedes cause they will move faster, but hey I am a stupid player what do I know.
Maybe stop worrying about unique play styles and maybe just buff the tanks a bit. Also love how a Russian medium even talking about being nerfed brings out every Unicom saying we cant nerf there favorite tanks but if its tanks like tds that have no problem nerfing them and removing them.
And buff the DPM, the is the only thing it needs. Cobra6, on 14 March - AM, said:. It would still be worse than say the Russian meds which have DPM and gun handling, but also armour.
Unless it was extreme it probably wouldn't make it better than the Cent AX either, which is an average tank but still has turret armour so is going to be more effective than a Leo and is almost as mobile, almost as accurate, has the same gun etc.
It needs buffing so its the ultimate mobile sniper, and make it stand out compared to the other NATO meds. The other buffs just make it a lot more effective sniper, able to reliable dish out bigger hits from long range at the expense of DPM.
Great to see this much opinions so far! This was also behind my reasoning for alpha suggestion. It would make corridor fights better for leopard 1 as it could trade more efficient.
At least for average player like me greater alpha would better choice than dpm. And as Leopard 1's soviet counterpart K is a dpm-monster, it would be fun diversity if there would be also a sniping medium which would be a hard-hitter.
IMO 2,5 k dpm sounds kind of very poor, so I'd keep it at 2,8 k. At the suggestion the alpha and dpm are exactly the same as , which has mm gun.
Dispersion 0,25 is the same as Strv b in siege mode - I'm thinking if it is too much for a turreted tank. I'm thinking of replacing the suggestion to 0,27 which is the same as Grille Aim time could be 1,5 sec for the more sniper tank to counter the worse soft stats - so I did change a bit the aim time suggestion.
As is also the weight for the 1A1A1 variant. The tank doesn't need a mm smoothbore, and I very much doubt WG will allow that gun in the game.
Give it the Object treatment. Accepting that this tank is large and has bad camo rating, hindering it's scouting ability, but also has no armour at all, it should retain its sub-par tier X gun handling and only have a slight DPS nerf reload from 7.
Leopard PTA goes entirely, or is reworked into a tier 8 premium of the Porche Leopard 1 prot, which would finance the whole tech tree rework.
We know WG only reworks things if they can make money from it right? For stats, HP should remain , or even However, here's the improvements the real tank had, and how I'd refelct them in the game stats of the tank:.
New grousers for the tracks, which are also stored on the hull as applique armour. I'd say the tank that needs the most buffing is the M48 Patton.
It has an average of Community Forum Software by IP. Leopard 1 buffs? Please log in to reply. I have heard some people talking about the Leopard 1 getting buffs in 2.Remember me. I guess it would get an armour buff if you did that though. No armor Meh gun handling and accuracy. Until they fix these 2 things the Leo will never be as conpetitive as the Russian meds for example. As is also the weight for the 1A1A1 variant. The poll would be about would people like more about 1A1A1 with mm gun or 1A1A1 prototype with mm gun. Damage Per Minute. It hasn't the armor to brawl or lead a charge GlГјckszahlen Waage its own, but it has the acceleration, maneuverability, and top speed to quickly Www.SolitГ¤r Kartenspiel occupied tanks and shoot them in the rear with its good rate of fire. U can snipe everybody and they dont see Ruby Fortune Casino Bewertung. You may have missed. France was very interested in the design as its own AMX 50 project had just failed. Leopard PTA goes entirely, or Regency Dublin reworked into a tier 8 premium of the Porche Leopard 1 prot, which would finance the whole tech tree rework. All other Crypto Trader Erfahrung is better only when marketing needs. Edited by ArcticTankHunter, Jun Bet At Home Gutschein 5 Euro -